Economics

Richard Florida: It’s Not (Just) the Working Class. It’s the Service Class.

The real contested terrain of American politics is the Service Class and its locations.

Share with your friends










Submit
More share buttons
Share on Pinterest

By Richard Florida

The Service Class, not the Working Class, is the key to the Democrats’ future. Members of the blue-collar Working Class are largely white men, working in declining industries like manufacturing, as well as construction, transportation, and other manual trades. Members of the Service Class work in rapidly growing industries like food service, clerical and office work, retail stores, hospitality, personal assistance, and the caring industries. The Service Class has more than double the members of the Working Class – 65 million versus 30 million members, and is made up disproportionately of women and members of ethnic and racial minorities.

A growing chorus of commentators contend that to be competitive the Democrats must win back the strongholds of the White Working Class. As Thomas B. Edsall wrote recently in The New York Times, 6.7 to 9.2 million Obama voters, mostly concentrated in the Midwest and the Rustbelt, switched their votes to Trump in 2016, more than enough to give him his Electoral College victory. Trying to recapture those white Working Class voters—many of whom are both more intolerant and less economically progressive than the party’s base—would not only be difficult, but counterproductive. A more effective and more realistic strategy, my own research suggests, is to attract the larger and growing ranks of the Service Class—especially by targeting the areas where they live.

The Republican and Democratic parties each have distinct class advantages that have not only persisted but grown stronger over time. Across America’s 350-plus metros, places where the Working Class is dominant went overwhelmingly for Trump. The correlation for the Working Class share of the workforce and Trump votes was substantial (0.53), while the correlation between the Working Class share and Clinton votes was negative (-0.51). Going back four years, the correlations were similar for Romney (0.46) and Obama (-0.45).

Get Evonomics in your inbox

On the flip side, the Democrats have a distinct and persistent advantage in the larger, denser, more knowledge-based metros, where the engineers, scientists, academics, designers, researchers, lawyers, senior managers, and arts professionals that make up the Creative Class are concentrated. Clinton votes were significantly correlated with the Creative Class share of the workforce (0.49), while Trump votes were even more negatively associated with Creative Class metros (-0.54). Again, these correlations were similar, if slightly weaker, in 2012, 0.40 for Obama and -0.41 for Romney.

The real contested terrain of American politics is the Service Class and its locations. If members of the blue-collar Working Class make up a fifth of the US workforce, and members of the Creative Class make up another third, the Service Class is by far the largest and fastest-growing class in America, accounting for more than 45 percent of the workforce (65 million strong and growing).

Here the data speaks for itself. In 2012, the statistical associations between partisan vote shares and Service Class shares were weak but slightly favoring the Democrats, 0.1 for Obama and -0.1 for Romney. But in 2016, Service Class locations were essentially up for grabs: there were no statistical associations between the Service Class shares of metros and Trump or Clinton votes. In Florida, for example, Clinton took larger, more densely-populated Service Class metros like Miami and Orlando, while Trump took smaller ones, like Pensacola, Myrtle Beach and Gulfport. The Democrats did not lose the election simply because the Republicans swung the Working Class, whose members and locations have long been trending in their direction, but because they were not able to inspire or mobilize the Service Class, too many of whose members simply stayed home.

Places with large Service Class populations hold the key to the Democrats’ future. With their disproportionate shares of working women, members of minority groups, and millennials, they are a natural Democratic coalition. Service Class workers make roughly $25,000 dollars per year—a fraction of what Creative Class and blue-collar workers earn. To galvanize them, the Democrats must craft a bold and aggressive agenda for inclusive prosperity, including a higher minimum wage indexed to geographic differences in living costs, stronger labor laws, as well as far-reaching programs to upgrade their jobs and turn them into actual careers, provide affordable housing, childcare, and healthcare, and establish a universal basic income, among many other things.

Although Trump’s policies will not help the Working Class, the Democratic Party cannot depend upon winning them back. To improve its standing in smaller, red-leaning metros, the Democratic Party must aggressively court the Service Class strongholds within them, adding them to the Creative Class metros that are already solidly blue.

*********

Richard Florida is University Professor and Director of Cities at the Martin Prosperity Institute at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management; Distinguished Visiting Fellow at NYU’s Shack Institute of Real Estate; and the co-founder and editor-at-large of The Atlantic’s CityLab. He is author of the recently released book New Urban Crisis.


Donating = Changing Economics. And Changing the World.

Evonomics is free, it’s a labor of love, and it's an expense. We spend hundreds of hours and lots of dollars each month creating, curating, and promoting content that drives the next evolution of economics. If you're like us — if you think there’s a key leverage point here for making the world a better place — please consider donating. We’ll use your donation to deliver even more game-changing content, and to spread the word about that content to influential thinkers far and wide.

MONTHLY DONATION
 $3 / month
 $7 / month
 $10 / month
 $25 / month

ONE-TIME DONATION
You can also become a one-time patron with a single donation in any amount.

If you liked this article, you'll also like these other Evonomics articles...




BE INVOLVED

We welcome you to take part in the next evolution of economics. Sign up now to be kept in the loop!

  • William Ellis

    where can one find the data on the geographic distribution of the three above mentioned groups, Creative class, working class and service class ?

  • Hanuman

    This is pure neoliberal garbage that belongs in the Op-Ed of the New York Times, not in Evonomics. The writer wants to return to the days of Good Team Blue vs. Bad Team Red. How childish. It’s not surprising he teaches at NYU.

    Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party scuttled the Sanders campaign. Instead of jail time for crooks like Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the like, we have shills from the “company” writing purple prose for service sector employees who don’t read economics. Who is he kidding? Fake librarian glasses can get you pretty far nowadays.

    We need a 50 state strategy for 2020. Forget the 2 parties and writers like Richard Florida. 50 states = 1 people, united. It can happen, but not from either party. The main divide is race. Both parties want to see blacks and whites hate each other. The Democrats sheepdog for the Republicans with ‘white guilt’ and the GOP sheepdogs for the Democrats with hate. Richard Florida is a smug white liberal who thinks his very existence proves his benevolence.

    Liberals are not friends of anyone or thing except their narcissistic need to appear good. Long story short, cost of living is too high due to rent seeking and privatization. Technology brings cost of production down, but rent seeking brings costs back up. This is but one example of the kind of problem that makes life today all but unbearable.

    Readers should be angry that such a shill has the gall to write how the Democratic Party can become stronger. We want the party of FDR, not the party of 2 faced liberal cowards who want to look like good people.

  • CityCalmDown

    >>>”Although Trump’s policies will not help the Working Class, the Democratic Party cannot depend upon winning them back”

    Why? This will continue to be the case only if the Dems insist upon being the other party of big Capital and Wall Street (as was the case under Clinton and Obama), choose to ignore economic issues, and continue to battle on the vacuous and stupefying terrain of culture-warring identity politics.

    Throughout this piece the author displays his abject failure to understand what class under *capitalism* is. The social, political and economic category of “class” is utterly meaningless if it is simply taken as being synonymous with “profession”.

    Amongst the ways in which the USA lost the Cold War one of the worst is that even American intellectuals don’t read Marx and Marxism. Or even Max Weber any more, it would seem.

    Under Capitalism, “class” is only meaningful if it describes material social and political relations as grounded in economic production and the relations of power.

    “Service classes” still fall within the category of “labour” as labour is deployed by Capital for the purpose of generating profit.

    The Dems could change direction if they became the party of Labour.

    (N.B. a party of Labour is not the same as a party of class emancipation)

    On the political history of labour in the USA see:

    Robin Archer – Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States?

    http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8668.html

    On the power relations of the Capitalist World-System see:

    Immanuel Wallerstein and his school of World-Systems Analysis.

    http://iwallerstein.com/intellectual-itinerary/

    • Hanuman

      CityCalmDown,

      Great point. Social class scares the modern Democratic Party. They are the current manifestation of the old Rockefeller Republicans. For them, social justice only comes in the form of charity. They do not see people as equals. They just love the rhetoric of equality. The Democratic Party is the party of the “Mandarin class” that services the needs of the elites. For them, charity is just a cover for domination and hegemony. Society is something to be controlled to maximise profits and increase market size while appearing to be moral.

      A current intellectual that writes/speaks directly to the points you make is Adolph Reed Jr. He’s been acutely aware of the fake concern of liberals in America for years. He teaches Political Science at Univ. of Penn. and is a founding member of the U.S. Labor Party.

      He called out Obama’s fake-ness in 2004.

      Of course, Thomas Frank’s latest book, “Listen, Liberal: Or Whatever Happened to the Party of the People,” tells the story of these concern-troll Democrats.

      • We Two

        “Mandarin Class” is exactly right.