Capitalism

How the Postal System and the Printing Press Transformed European Markets

In the sixteenth century European markets opened up as merchant guild monopolies declined.

Share with your friends










Submit
More share buttons
Share on Pinterest

By Prateek Raj

In the sixteenth century, the Northwest European region of England and the Low Countries underwent transformational change. In this region, a bourgeois culture emerged and cities like Antwerp, Amsterdam, and London became centers of institutional and business innovation, whose accomplishments have influenced the modern world.

For example, one of the first permanent commodity bourses was established in Antwerp in 1531, the first stock exchange emerged in Amsterdam in 1602, and joint stock companies became a promising form of organizing business in London in the late sixteenth century. The sixteenth century transformation was followed by the seventeenth century Dutch Golden Age, and the eighteenth century English Industrial Revolution. What made the Northwest region of Europe so different? The question remains a central concern in social sciences, with scholars from diverse fields (Weber, 1905; North, 1990Padgett and Powell, 2012McCloskey, 2016Rubin, 2017) researching the subject.

The medieval power of merchant guilds

Markets don’t function well if they are ridden with frictions like lack of information, lack of trust, or high transaction costs. In the presence of frictions, business is often conducted via relationships.

Get Evonomics in your inbox

Until the end of the fifteenth century, impartial institutions like courts and police that serve all parties generally—so ubiquitous today in the developed world—weren’t well developed in Europe. In such a world without impartial institutions, trade often was (is) heavily dependent on relationships and conducted through networks like merchant guilds. Such relationship-based trade through dense networks of merchant guilds reduced concerns of information access and reliability. Not surprisingly, because the merchant guild system was an effective system in the absence of strong formal institutions, it sustained in Europe for several centuries. In developing countries like India, lacking in developed formal institutions, networked institutions like castes still play an important role in business.

Before the fourteenth century, merchant guild networks were probably less hierarchical, more voluntary, and more inclusive. But, with time, merchant guilds started to become exclusive monopolies, placing high barriers to entry for outsiders, and they began to resemble cartels with close involvement in local politics. There were two reasons why these guilds erected such tough barriers to entry:

  • Repeated committed interaction was the key to effectiveness of merchant guilds. Uncommitted outsiders could behave opportunistically and undermine the reliability of the system. Therefore, outsiders faced restrictions.
  • Outsiders threatened the position of existing businessmen by increasing competition. So, even genuinely committed outsiders could be restricted to enter as they threatened the domination of existing members.

But, in the sixteenth century, the merchant guild system began to lose its significance as more impersonal markets, where traders could directly trade without the need of an affiliation, began to emerge (see Region 1 of map in Figure I) and rulers stopped granting privileges to merchant guilds. The traders began to rely less on networked and collective institutions like merchant guilds, and directly initiated partnerships with traders who they may not have known well. For example, in Antwerp the domination of intermediaries (called hostellers)who would connect foreign traders declined. Instead, the foreign traders began to conduct such trades directly with each other in facilities like bourses.

Emergence of markets in the 16th century

In a new working paper, I study the emergence of impersonal markets in Europe during the sixteenth century. I survey the 50 largest European cities during the fourteenth through sixteenth centuries (mapped in Figure I) and codify the nature of sixteenth century economic institutions in each of the cities (explore interactive data on early modern Europe). In the survey, I find that merchant guilds were declining in the Northwest region of Europe, while elsewhere in Europe they continued to dominate commerce until much later, although there were some reforms underway in the Milanese and Viennese regions of Italy.

What explains the observed pattern of emergence of impersonal markets in sixteenth century Europe? I focus on the interaction between the commercial and communication revolutions of the late fifteenth century Europe. In the paper, I argue that the Northwest European region uniquely benefited from both of these revolutions due to its unique geography.

Commercial revolution at the Atlantic coast

What motivated traders to seek risky opportunities beyond close networks? If traders found partnerships with unfamiliar traders beyond their business networks to be highly beneficial, that would provide good incentives for the rise of impersonal markets. The Northwest Region was close to the sea, notably the Atlantic coast, which was at the time undergoing a commercial revolution with the discovery of new sea routes to Asia and the Americas. So, the region became a hub for long distance trade, attracting unfamiliar traders who came to its coast looking for business opportunity. I find that all cities where merchant guild privileges declined were at the sea, along the Atlantic or North Sea coast. Moreover, all cities where merchant guilds underwent reform (but didn’t decline) were within 150km of a sea port.

The communication revolution of the postal system and the printing press

What made traders feel confident about the reliability of such risky impersonal partnerships? If availability of trade-related information and business practices improved, it could increase confidence traders had in such unfamiliar partnerships. In the sixteenth century, the postal system improved across Europe. The postal system made communication between distant traders easier as traders could correspond regularly with each other and gain more accurate information. This helped expand long distance trade across Europe.

While the Northwest European region didn’t have a particular advantage over other regions in postal communication, it had an advantage in early diffusion of printed books. The Northwest European region was close to Mainz, the city where Johannes Gutenberg invented the movable time printing press in the mid fifteenth century. Dittmar (2011) showed how cities close to Mainz adopted printing sooner than many other regions of Europe in the first few decades of its introduction. So, trade-related books and new (or unknown) business practices like double-entry bookkeeping diffused early and rapidly in the region.

Such a high penetration of printed material reduced information barriers and improved business practices. I find that all cities where guild privileges declined or merchant guilds underwent reform in the sixteenth century enjoyed high penetration of printed material in the fifteenth century. Among cities within a 150km distance from a sea port, cities where merchant guilds declined or reformed had more than twice the number of diffused books per capita than cities where merchant guilds continued to dominate.

As a comparison, there were four major Atlantic port cities where merchant guilds declined: Hamburg, London, Antwerp, and Amsterdam; while there were four guild-based Atlantic cities: Lisbon, Seville, Rouen, and Bordeaux in the sixteenth century. The fifteenth century per capita printing penetration of the cities would stack as: Lisbon < Bordeaux < Hamburg < Seville < Rouen < London < Amsterdam < Antwerp.

The combination of both the commercial revolution along the sea coast, especially the Atlantic coast, and the communication revolution, especially near Mainz, uniquely benefited Northwest Europe, as it began to attract traders who favored impersonal market-based exchange over exchange conducted via guild networks. Rulers began to disfavor privileged monopolies when they realized the feasibility of impersonal exchange and that they could have superior sources of revenue from impersonal markets. In the region, trade democratized, as more people could participate in business.

Regions like Spain and Portugal that benefited only from the commercial revolution of trade through the sea to Asia and Americas had low levels of printing penetration. In contrast, regions like Germany, Italy, and France benefited from the communication and print revolution but didn’t enjoy a bustling Atlantic coast. Thus, no other region enjoyed the unique combination of both benefits of the commercial and communication revolution.

Takeaway for policy makers: democratize the market

If information access is poor (lack of transparency) or businesses don’t adopt reliable business practices (poor financial reporting or opaque quality standards), these deficiencies at the business level can make customers and investors question the reliability of new businesses. Politicians, like medieval rulers, may be more willing to enter into a nexus with dominant businesses, like medieval merchant guilds, if 1) market frictions or 2) lack of incentives make the economy dependent on such businesses.

This was the case with the taxi industry for a long time, where customers were willing to pay a high fee to get reliable taxi services as supply of drivers was low (new drivers in cities like London had to pay a high license fee and fulfill tough training requirements). But, better taxi hailing mobile apps like Lyft and Uber, by giving customers access to real time GPS tracking, have revolutionized the industry, much like the communication revolution did in late fifteenth and sixteenth century. Another area where information access has improved reliability in business is the tourism and travel industry.

While in the past the tourism sector was dominated by travel agents and their recommended offerings, now an influx of providers and travel comparison websites, such as expedia.com and AirBnB, has increased the reliability of small unknown hospitality service providers. Today, many prefer to stay at a stranger’s home over a reputed hotel chain. Such a revolution in the taxi or the travel industry is following the old historical trend where disruption in how information is made available changes how businesses are organized.

Originally published at Promarket.org.

2017 July 29


Donating = Changing Economics. And Changing the World.

Evonomics is free, it’s a labor of love, and it's an expense. We spend hundreds of hours and lots of dollars each month creating, curating, and promoting content that drives the next evolution of economics. If you're like us — if you think there’s a key leverage point here for making the world a better place — please consider donating. We’ll use your donation to deliver even more game-changing content, and to spread the word about that content to influential thinkers far and wide.

MONTHLY DONATION
 $3 / month
 $7 / month
 $10 / month
 $25 / month

ONE-TIME DONATION
You can also become a one-time patron with a single donation in any amount.

If you liked this article, you'll also like these other Evonomics articles...




BE INVOLVED

We welcome you to take part in the next evolution of economics. Sign up now to be kept in the loop!

  • Rayane Saadeh

    Nice article. This explains (partly) how merchant thalassocraties like Venice and Genoa declined after the end of the Middle Ages.
    But the author gets lost in Neoliberal Land when he likens uber to free markets disrupting old practices and monopolies. It’s the exact opposite! A direct relation is between a taxi driver and his customer.

    Uber isn’t merely a software that taxi drivers use, it is a company, and Uber drivers are employees. Uber isn’t creating a freer market than before, it is driving out of business its competitors and installing a monopoly.

    But taking Uber as an example gives us another information: markets are institutions created by humans. Were it a simple software, Uber would have been another rock added to the institution of the taxi market. I say this because many neoliberals see the market as natural, yet they laud Uber for having created a market.

    • Prateek Raj

      Thanks Rayane. I agree that Uber and Lyft don’t equal free markets, and they have their own issues related to antitrust. I have other articles that you may like to read.
      1) The first draws parallels between merchant guilds and taxi associations, and the complexity of regulating the taxi industry. https://promarket.org/regulation-build-trust-entrench-cliques/
      2) The second discusses the broader intellectual history of antitrust thought in America. https://promarket.org/antimonopoly-old-republic/
      I hope these articles and more on promarket.org can be a useful source on discussion and debate on these issues.

    • Synoia

      Venice and Genoa could also have declined because the Portuguese had discovered a marine route to the orient, the Netherlands escaped from Spanish rule sometime in this period, and Elizabethan era came to England.

      Protestantism also was spreading quickly over these parts of Europe, with its differences in dogma from Southern (Catholic) Europe.

      There are too many factors to begin to imply causality as suggested in this article.

      Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

  • Peter van den Engel

    Nice article. I presume though that the printing press and the invention of the stockmarket had the greatest impact in developing these markets and not so much merchant guilds evolution, although that was also influenced by it.

    The printing press must have.had a big influence in being able to print money. So bankers could much easier serve markets than before and stimulated investing in new enterprises.
    I presume; although I have not found proof of it; that the clergy who was writing books by hand, was also very interested in the new technique and they had experience with money in their coisters on traderoutes before, so they might have become new bankers.

    Next to that the invention of stock made investment risks much less risky; you buy the initial costs and when the ships return its value has trippeld; while at the same time the bank was out of risk, since none of its own money was involved.
    All this drove the enthousiasm for investing in shipping enterprizes to such hights, it preluded the first stock market crisis: the tulip crase.
    So, these differences created a big gap with other cities in Europe on the sea, that were not further away frm

    • Prateek Raj

      Thanks very much. Derecho Mercantil wrote a blog post on the paper as where it linked the Northwestern Divergence to Joint Stock Companies. It may interest you as well. https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fderechomercantilespana.blogspot.com.es%2F2017%2F07%2Fhacia-los-intercambios-impersonales-en.html%3F&sandbox=1

      • Peter van den Engel

        Yes, interesting. Another reason why Spain was less fortunate is that they imported gold from South America, which paradoxly decreased the value of the pesos, because it was ‘free money’ with no labor comparison. (note the culural difference in current gold appreciation)
        So it was increasingly difficult for them to finance armies, surpessing the Lowlands. A war they lost.

        The reason for decline of Antwerp by the way was that Spanish armies completely distroyed it and in reaction its scolars moved north to Amsterdam.

        Next to that you should realise there always remains a familiar connection even in unpersonal markets. The Dutch merchant guild fi was protected by the national fleet under command of admiral de Ruyter, that also ment less investment in ground army protection, which created a political problem that eventually led to the lynchparty and a change in government.